Publications

Local literature search

Below you can search for publications authored or edited by researchers at the School of Communication and Culture.

You can also use Aarhus University’s literature search service

Sort by: Date | Author | Title

Eriksson, E., Iversen, O. S., Baykal, G. E., Van Mechelen, M., Smith, R. C., Wagner, M.-L., Fog, B. V., Klokmose, C. N., Cumbo, B., Hjorth, H. A., Musaeus, L. H., Petersen, M. G. & Bouvin, N. O. (2019). Widening the Scope of FabLearn Research: Integrating Computational Thinking, Design and Making. Paper presented at Fablearn Europe 2019, Oulu, Finland. https://doi.org/10.1145/3335055.3335070

Thorhauge, S. & Porse, L. H. (2025). Wicked problems i billedkunst og design: – kan de løses med STEAM-undervisning og inddragelse af museer? Tegn.

Khair, T. (2014). Why we still read the Bard: Tabish Khair justifies the acclaimed survival of Shakespeare. The Hindu. http://www.thehindu.com/books/literary-review/why-we-still-read-the-bard/article5875999.ece

French, C. (2024, Jul 28). Why we should support community artists in Birmingham’s volatile, post-Commonwealth Games ecology. University of Birmingham Press. https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/news/2024/why-we-should-support-community-artists-in-birminghams-volatile-post-commonwealth-games-ecology

Clasen, M. (2016, Oct 28). Why we love horror (and Halloween). http://blog.oup.com/2016/10/horror-film-popularity/

Tække, J. (2015, Jan). Why we are tracking. http://www.jespertaekke.dk/2015/01/why-we-are-tracking/

Bengesser, C. H. (2022). Why Translations Matter: An Introduction to Critical Studies in Television's new section 'In Translation'. Critical Studies in Television, 17(1), 76-83. https://doi.org/10.1177/17496020211070046

Clasen, M. (2020). Why the World Is a Better Place with Stephen King in It: An Evolutionary Perspective. In J. Carroll, M. Clasen & E. Jonsson (Eds.), Evolutionary Perspectives on Imaginative Culture (pp. 325-341). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46190-4_17

Nielsen, H. S. & Phelan, J. (2017). Why There Are No One-to-One Correspondences among Fictionality, Narrative, and Techniques: A Response to Mari Hatavara and Jarmila Mildorf. Narrative, 25(1), 83-91. https://doi.org/10.1353/nar.2017.0005

Brügger, N. (2003). Why Theories of Media and Communication? Nordicom Review, 24(2), 143-146.

Koldau, L. M. (2011). Why Submarines? Interdisciplinary Approaches to a Cultural Myth of War. Journal of War and Culture Studies, 4(1), 65-78.

Kraglund, R. A., Iversen, S., Nielsen, H. S., Reestorff, C. M., Jacobsen, L. B. & Alber, J. (Eds.) (2011). Why study literature? Aarhus Universitetsforlag.

Kanareva-Dimitrovska, A. (2018). Why study abroad? Student motivation to study abroad and their intercultural development. Manuscript in preparation.

Clasen, M. (2023, Jan 3). Why Some People Don't Like Horror Movies: There are good as well as bad reasons for avoiding horror movies. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/why-we-love-horror/202301/why-some-people-dont-like-horror-movies

Khair, T. (2023, Apr 8). Why Salman Rushdie Must Win the Nobel Prize for Literature in 2023.

Bothma, T. & Tarp, S. (2014). Why relevance theory is relevant for lexicography. Lexicographica: International Annual for Lexicography / Revue Internationale de Lexicographie / Internationales Jahrbuch für Lexikographie, 30(1), 350-378. https://doi.org/10.1515/lexi-2014-0013

Kjeldgaard-Christiansen, J. (2017). Why Publish, and Why Publish in Leviathan: Interdisciplinary Journal in English? Leviathan: Interdisciplinary Journal in English, (1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.7146/lev.v0i1.96776

Wilson, A. (2014). Why Process is Extrinsic to the Digital Domain. https://www.academia.edu/11496288/Why_Process_is_Extrinsic_to_the_Digital_Domain

Khair, T. (2017). Why Literature is the Answer to Fundamentalism. The Hindu.

Khair, T. (2019). Why literature is the answer to extremism: foreword. In B. Majoul (Ed.), Terrorism in literature: examining a global phenomenon (pp. xi-xii). Cambridge Scholars Press.

Engberg, J. (2024). Why languages (as input for knowledge construction) are central objects in comparative law. In J. Husa (Ed.), A Research Agenda for Comparative Law (pp. 157-176). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035317509.00013

Hejná, M. (2018). Why I work in the field of Language Variation and Change. Leviathan: Interdisciplinary Journal in English, 2, 1-12. https://tidsskrift.dk/lev/article/download/104686/153600/

Hejná, M., Kjeldgaard-Christiansen, J. & Eaton, M. (2024). Why interdisciplinary approaches to voice studies? In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on the Foundations of Speech: Proceedings of the 2023 Aarhus International Conference on Voice Studies (pp. 1-5). Sciendo (DeGruyter). https://doi.org/10.2478/9788366675513-001

Berthelsen, U. D. (Accepted/In press). Why Humans Dream of Electric Sheep: Philip K. Dick on the Human Condition. In U. D. Berthelsen, M. R. Thomsen & M. Tannert (Eds.), Beyond the Turing Test: What science fiction can teach us about artificial intelligence Routledge - Taylor & Francis.

Clasen, M. (2017). Why Horror Seduces. Oxford University Press.

Clasen, M. (2018, Jan 7). Why Horror Is So Popular: And may even be good for us. http://sciencenordic.com/why-horror-so-popular

Frich Pedersen, J., Biskjaer, M. M. & Dalsgaard, P. (2018). Why HCI and Creativity Research Must Collaborate to Develop New Creativity Support Tools. In Proceedings of American Psychological Association’s conference on Technology, Mind & Society Article 10 Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3183654.3183678

Khair, T. (2023, Sept). Why has the Rule of Law become so Fragile? https://www.theindiaforum.in/essay/why-has-rule-law-become-so-fragile

Kjeldgaard-Christiansen, J. (2020, Jan 15). Why has it become so difficult to spot who’s the villain in Disney films? Evolutionary Studies in Imaginative Culture (ESIC). https://esiculture.com/blog/2020/1/15/whos-the-villain-in-disney-films

Vikner, S. (2019). Why German is not an SVO-language but an SOV-language with V2. In A. M. Nyvad (Ed.), A Sound Approach to Language Matters: In Honour of Ocke-Schwen Bohn (pp. 437-447). AU Library Scholarly Publishing Services. https://doi.org/10.7146/aul.322.218

Scrivner, C. & Clasen, M. (2022). Why frightening imaginary worlds? Morbid curiosity and the learning potential of horror. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 45, Article E297. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X21002259

Hansen, L. E. & Degn, H.-P. (2021). Why do people attend cultural events? Towards a typology of motivations. Abstract from NCCPR 2021: Nordic Conference on Cultural Policy Research, Borås, Sweden.

Jensen, P. M. (2016). Why Does the World Love Danish Television Drama?. Abstract from SMID Biennial Meeting, Middelfart, Denmark.

Jensen, P. M. (2015). Why does Danish TV Drama Travel? A Three-Tier Seven-Country Audience Study on the Rise of Denmark’s Transnational TV Culture: A Three-Tier Seven-Country Audience Study on the Rise of Denmark’s Transnational TV Culture. Paper presented at IAMCR 2015, Montreal, Canada.

Nielsen, J. I. (2018). Why Danish TV Series Travel. Poster session presented at Transnational Television Drama, Aarhus, Denmark.

Engels, E. (2012). Wh-phrases and neg-phrases in clauses and nominals. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax, 89, 1-36.

Hermann, P. (2010). Who were the Papar? Typological structures in Íslendingabók. In J. Sheehan & D. Ó Corráin (Eds.), The Viking Age. Ireland and the West.: Proceedings of the Fifteenth Viking Congress (pp. 145-153). Four Courts Press.

Kuhlmann, A. (2022). Who's there? - Agency, temporality and spatiality in theatre historiography exemplified with the first Danish stage production of Hamlet in Denmark, 1813. 52-53. Abstract from International Federation of Theatre Research World Congress 2022 , Reykjavík, Iceland.

Borkfelt, S. (2022). Who Slaughters and Who Consumes? On Butcher(ing) Identities. In Reading Slaughter: Abattoir Fictions, Space, and Empathy in Late Modernity (pp. 181-221). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98915-6_6

Bechmann, A. (2017). Whose vision? The Use of Convolutional Neural Networks on Facebook Images. Abstract from Social AI, Irvine, CA, United States.

Bechmann, A. & Bowker, G. C. (2017). Whose Ontologies, at what Cost? AI and Invisibility in Social Media Arenas. Abstract from Propaganda and Media Manipulation, New York, United States.

Sparre, K. (2017). Whose news is it anyway? A study of native advertising practices in Danish journalistic media. Abstract from Future of Journalism 2017, Cardiff, United Kingdom.

Michelsen, L. L. (2024). Who Sees with Machines? A Review of Jill Walker Rettberg’s (Perhaps Not So) Posthuman Book on Machine Vision. Electronic Book Review, 2024.

Refskou, A. S. (2017). Whose Castle is it Anyway?: Local/Global Negotiations of a Shakespearean Location. Multicultural Shakespeare: Translation, Appropriation and Performance, 15(30), 121-132. https://doi.org/https://czasopisma.uni.lodz.pl/szekspir/article/view/2279

Karlsson, A. (2021). Whose bodies? Approaching the quantified menstruating body through a feminist ethnography. In B. Ajana, J. Braga & S. Guidi (Eds.), The Quantification of Bodies in Health: Multidisciplinary Perspectives (pp. 117-132). Emerald Group Publishing.

Matzen, P. L. (2024). Whose Bildung? Institutional self-critique in art exhibitions on colonial history. [PhD dissertation, Aarhus University].

Ledderer, L. K. & Fage-Butler, A. (2022). WHO’s communication on Twitter about the risks of COVID-19: A discourse analysis of WHO’s tweets. Abstract from The 24th World Conference on Health Promotion, Montreal, Canada.

Fage-Butler, A. & Ledderer, L. K. (2021). WHO's communication on Twitter about the risks of Covid-19. Abstract from Communication, Medicine & Ethics (COMET). https://www.uninsubria.eu/sites/sten/files/File_Eventi/COMET2021/COMET%202021_BoA_1.pdf

Sun, A., Londono, J. J., Elbaum, B., Estrada, L., Lazo, R. J., Vitale, L., Villasanti, H. G., Fusaroli, R., Perry, L. K. & Messinger, D. S. (2024). Who Said what? An Automated Approach to Analyzing Speech in Preschool Classrooms. In 2024 IEEE International Conference on Development and Learning (ICDL) (pp. 1-8). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDL61372.2024.10644508

Sun, A., Londono, J. J., Elbaum, B., Estrada, L., Lazo, R. J., Vitale, L., Villasanti, H. G., Fusaroli, R., Perry, L. K. & Messinger, D. S. (2024). Who Said What? An Automated Approach to Analyzing Speech in Preschool Classrooms.

Displaying results 301 to 350 out of 25383

Revised 16.04.2026

Arts Communication